Tuesday, 10 Rajab 1447 | 2025/12/30
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

The Outcome of Participation in Democratic Elections: Assaulting the Values of the Muslims in Afghanistan

The Karzai presided corrupt and puppet government of Afghanistan has been implementing manmade laws on Muslims in Afghanistan since its establishment, which unquestionably contradict the noble values of Islam. Based on the corrupt capitalistic system, banks have spread and imposed usury and have encouraged the Muslims towards it, whilst Allah (swt) has declared usury (Riba) haram and His Messenger (saw) cursed the one who pays usury, one who takes it and the one who bears witness to it.

Read more...

US Shift in Strategy from War to Peace? Political Analysis by Majlis Wilayah Afghanistan September 2013

Introduction

Afghanistan is in the heart of Asia and a crossroad between geopolitical and geostrategic wise important countries of the region in the context of regional and Eurasian politics. However, the geopolitics and geography of Afghanistan itself is a riddle for countries that want to use this country to ensure their interests in the region and beyond.

Read more...

The American Led International Coalition to strike Syria Aims to Impose its Rule and Save Bashar, and Hit the Islamists and Prevent the Arrival of the Islamic Project to Power

The American position has announced the decision to punitively strike the Syrian regime after Bashar made use of chemical weapons against civilians in Damascus on 8/21/2013 surprised the countries of the world. Some of these countries took a supportive position, declaring their willingness to join the international coalition that is to direct this strike under the lead of America. The wave of regional and international media undertook a change of direction, such that the talk about this intervention is the first topic that is making the round. Obama has described the chemical attack as "an important event that raised grave concern", announced America's intention to launch a military strike against strategic targets in Syria and opposed the call for military intervention in Syria without a UN mandate. The spokesman of the White House repeated what his president had stated earlier, in that he does not expect the deployment of U.S. troops on the ground in Syria. U.S. Secretary of Defense Hagel told reporters that "the Ministry of Defense is responsible for providing the president with options for each case of emergency." Pentagon officials said that the 4 destroyers of the U.S. Navy are on standby to carry out any order they are given concerning Syria within hours. The newspaper The Washington Post cited a military official that all destroyers are armed with about 90 winged Tomahawk rockets and that there are American submarines carrying winged missiles in the Mediterranean Sea, but their positions remain confidential.  A closed meeting of the leaders of the armies of ten countries was held in Amman to discuss the scenario of directing a military strike, and the Washington Post Newspaper in its issue from 8/27/2013 revealed that the process would depend "in its timing on three factors: the completion of the intelligence report that assesses the extent of the involvement of the Syrian government in the attack of last week, ongoing consultations with the allies and the  Congress, and the determination of the justification for the attack under international law."  America announced that the aim of the strike is to punish and discipline Bashar for his use of chemical weapons, but not to bring about a regime change. A senior official in the U.S. State Department said that the chemical attack showed the need for "a comprehensive political solution and lasting peace" to end the crisis in Syria.

 

In the presence of this crowd of international positions of pro-military strike, and the statements and actions of the American military, and the array of media effort to report on this strike, the Russian position dramatically plunged into humiliation. Moreover Lavrov's announcement that Russia would not enter into war for anyone, and the Russian announcement of its intention to vacate its military pieces from its naval base in Tartus in the event of the strike. More than 120 Russian nationals were evacuated, and Russia expressed its regrets for the cancellation of a meeting with the U.S. that was scheduled to be held in The Hague on 8/28/2013 in order to prepare the ground for the Geneva 2 Conference. As for Iran, it started rearing, puffing and threatening but quietly without causing noise, and it has to be mentioned that the American and UN political official, the fox Jeffrey Feltman, visited Tehran suggesting a scenario and distribution of roles.

 

America owns the sole influence in Syria, and its influence there is endangered by the revolution. In vain were all of the political and criminal and brutal tricks to destroy the revolution, America did not even succeed in securing an agent ruler as Bashar's alternative, not to mention its failure in the production of such an alternative. Now here comes America with another hellish plan to be implemented and carried out by it, no less criminal than the criminality and monstrosity of Bashar in robbing lives. This plan started with the chemical strike executed ​​by Bashar to be used as a justification for military intervention, and to thereby open the door of the political process leading to Geneva 2. A prominent member of the Syrian opposition exposed for the al-Sharq al-Awsat the features of an agreement between the opposition and those allied countries, and said that "the process will not eliminate the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, but will bring to the negotiating table Geneva 2 exhaustively" and that "the Syrian president at the end of the negotiations and as a result will step down." To go even further, he also told al-Sharq al-Awsat that according to sources of the Syrian opposition the American side asked them to offer it a "bank of targets " to be used for the strike, and that meetings will be held between U.S. experts and members of the military councils to set the assumed goals.

 

It is likely that in such a meeting they will run through scenarios to eliminate Islamist fighters, the owners of the project to establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" state in Syria. Therefore the strike is expected to be limited and calculated, to strike the essential military infrastructure, so that the new Syria is one at peace with Israel. It will lead to the loss of many Muslim lives, as happened in Libya, and as it happens in Afghanistan when masses are killed by U.S. drones bombing civilians under the pretext of hitting the leaders of al-Qaida and the Taliban. America through its military dominance will impose itself as the main administrator of the dialogue, and it will impose its own project of solutions on the opposition and the regime as participants in the dialogue, as it will impose the sending of strong, effective international forces to cooperate with the national army to attack anyone who violates this project.

 

Further America will impose the preservation of the security services by which Bashar kills the Muslims, because they will guarantee the American grasp of the new regime. Finally America will set up international tribunals to bring to trial some of those known to have killed people, to silence the public and give them a sense of relief, as they did in Kosovo...

 

Oh Muslims in Syria ash-Sham and other Muslim countries:

America is the head of evil in the world; it is the worst enemy of the Muslims! America is now on the verge of committing massacres in Syria that will not be less than those committed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and you will see that they will assume the mission of mass murder against Muslims from Bashar, and with it will come an international mandate to kill, they will impose a secular constitution and agent rulers upon you... Today the same America is the weakest it has ever been in the region, it is threatened with loss of influence in the region. America is unable to stabilize the political situation through its clients in Egypt and Syria and it has made its bitter experience with the Muslims.  Now they claim that they do not want to occupy Syria, just as they did in Iraq and Afghanistan, rather America wants to impose its political agenda so as to achieve its interests without occupation... It is this America that loves to announce its refusal of intervention and fighting, and anyone who demands this is a traitor to his Deen and his Ummah... America came to save its interests and its agent Bashar who they still considered president, and will work to secure a safe exit for him, his family and his aides ... It is this America that is an enemy to you so take it for what it is! Unmask its agents with the strongest and clearest of words!  All of the murder, torture, displacement, hunger, humiliation and arrest you have suffered... It will not be compensated except by raising the word of Allah on earth ... It is this America that has let loose its henchmen on you and it wants to drag the world into the war against you and your Deen, and it will repeat this cycle over and over again.

Not one of you are excused for remaining silent for their intended crime, you are obligated to prohibit it!

 

Oh Muslims in Syria ash-Sham and other Muslim countries:

Allah's commands and prohibitions must be the measures of our actions. Allah has enjoined on the Muslims to embrace the Islamic project based on the establishment of a Khilafah "Caliphate" State. Look around you, is there any project that brings together the Muslims and unites them apart from this project and that will enable you to stand in the face of the American project?!  Is it without Allah that you could overcome the masses of Kufr, no matter how great they are? So be with Allah for He will be with you, and give victory to His Deen for He will give you victory. Hizb ut Tahrir calls you to this great obligation that is most strongly fought by America, the West, the nations of the world and the rulers of the Muslims and the secularists. But Allah is the One who takes care of His affairs, for He (swt) said:

أُذِنَ لِلَّذِينَ يُقَاتَلُونَ بِأَنَّهُمْ ظُلِمُوا وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلَى نَصْرِهِمْ لَقَدِيرٌ * الَّذِينَ أُخْرِجُوا مِنْ دِيَارِهِمْ بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ إِلَّا أَنْ يَقُولُوا رَبُّنَا اللَّهُ وَلَوْلَا دَفْعُ اللَّهِ النَّاسَ بَعْضَهُمْ بِبَعْضٍ لَهُدِّمَتْ صَوَامِعُ وَبِيَعٌ وَصَلَوَاتٌ وَمَسَاجِدُ يُذْكَرُ فِيهَا اسْمُ اللَّهِ كَثِيرًا وَلَيَنْصُرَنَّ اللَّهُ مَنْ يَنْصُرُهُ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَقَوِيٌّ عَزِيزٌ * الَّذِينَ إِنْ مَكَّنَّاهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ أَقَامُوا الصَّلَاةَ وَآتَوُا الزَّكَاةَ وَأَمَرُوا بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَنَهَوْا عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ وَلِلَّهِ عَاقِبَةُ الْأُمُورِ

"Permission [to fight] has been given to those who are being fought, because they were wronged. And indeed, Allah is competent to give them victory. [They are] those who have been evicted from their homes without right - only because they say, "Our Lord is Allah." And were it not that Allah checks the people, some by means of others, there would have been demolished monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques in which the name of Allah is much mentioned. And Allah will surely support those who support Him. Indeed, Allah is Powerful and Exalted in Might." [Al-Hajj 22:39-40]

 

 

Read more...

Press Release American Claim and its Adherents to Bring Triumph to the Victims of the Chemical Attacks in East Damascus and to Strike the Regime, is but an Attempt to Resuscitate the Clinically Dead Regime and to Circumvent the Sincere Rebels

A number of leaders from the FSA's Joint Chiefs of Staff issued a statement announcing that: "the international and global conspiracy against the blessed Syrian revolution has become clear and apparent, and their involvement with the Magi occupation in spilling the Syrian blood using all kinds of weapons including that which is internationally forbidden, and after a whole year of false promises by the so-called friends of Syria states, it has become apparent that they do not care about the red lines." They also announced that "the stance of the Arab and Islamic countries, especially those who claim support for the Syrian revolution is so meager that it has not reached the level of the sacrifices of the Syrian people, who are fighting a war on behalf of the Arab and Islamic nation, knowing that this fire will reach everyone if they do not fulfill their responsibilities." They threatened to submit their resignation from the commission's membership if "the level of support provided by the Arabs and Muslims does not reach the level of sacrifices made by the Syrian people." Also declaring "cessation of all forms of cooperation with the UN Security Council Resolutions States unless an urgent international investigation takes place for the use of chemical weapons by the criminal regime, and hence hold it accountable immediately." In addition that "based on our resignations, the council will be no longer legitimate and does not represent the Syrian people."

We would like to remind those in the council with warm words that would fall on attentive ears that they should not expect from the Western states, nor their counterparts from the Arab leaders who are traitors to their religion and Ummah, any serious stances for the support of the revolution of Al-Sham and the establishment of the Islamic Khilafah "Caliphate" in the land of Syria. For this, their stance should have been decisive in their statement not reluctant, since no good should be expected from such people. We declare that the international coalition, led by America, who has announced to strike the Syrian regime is a stance that aims to achieve their own interests, and to control the upcoming political process, including striking anyone with an Islamic direction, in which you are included. We therefore remind you that whoever is with Allah (swt), will be with Allah (swt) alone, and does not take a partner with Him, and the doctrinal stance and the legislative rule related to your case require you to be with Allah (swt) alone. Allah (swt) said:

فَاسْتَقِمْ كَمَا أُمِرْتَ وَمَنْ تَابَ مَعَكَ وَلَا تَطْغَوْا إِنَّهُ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ * وَلَا تَرْكَنُوا إِلَى الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا فَتَمَسَّكُمُ النَّارُ وَمَا لَكُمْ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ مِنْ أَوْلِيَاءَ ثُمَّ لَا تُنْصَرُونَ

"Pursue, then, the right course, as thou hast been bidden [by Allah], together with all who, with thee, have turned unto Him; and let none of you behave in an overweening manner: for, verily, He sees all that you do. And do not incline towards, nor rely upon, those who are bent on evildoing lest the fire [of the hereafter] touch you: for [then] you would have none to protect you from Allah, nor would you ever be succoured [by Him]." [TMQ 11:112-113]

 

O Patient Muslims in Syria of Al-Sham: You are embarking upon days of deceit, which can only be detected with greater direction to Allah alone, and an increase in drawing help from Allah (swt) alone. The American claim and its adherents to bring triumph to the victims of the chemical attacks in East Damascus is but an attempt to revive political negotiations under the pressure of the military action, and to circumvent the sincere sons of the Ummah in order to abort their efforts and prevent them from overthrowing the Coalition and its agent the Chiefs of Staff; we therefore warn our brothers in the revolution of Al-Sham from this criminal campaign under the guise of striking the regime that it is to strike the revolution and the sincere ones in it. Allah (swt) said:

((وَقَدْ مَكَرُوا مَكْرَهُمْ وَعِنْدَ اللَّهِ مَكْرُهُمْ وَإِنْ كَانَ مَكْرُهُمْ لِتَزُولَ مِنْهُ الْجِبَالُ (46) فَلَا تَحْسَبَنَّ اللَّهَ مُخْلِفَ وَعْدِهِ رُسُلَهُ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَزِيزٌ ذُو انْتِقَامٍ))

"And [this retribution will befall all evildoers because] they devise that false imagery of theirs [61] - and all their false imagery is within Allah's knowledge. [And never can the blasphemers prevail against the truth - not] even if their false imagery were so (well devised and so powerful] that mountains could be moved thereby. HENCE, do not think that Allah will fail to fulfil the promise which He gave to His apostles: [62] Verily, Allah is almighty, an avenger of evil!" [TMQ 14:46-47]

 

Hisham Al-Baba

Head of the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

Wilayah of Syria

Read more...

The Answer to the Question: 1. The Hukm (ruling) of Women who Participate on the Battle Field 2. Relationship of the Islamic State with Belligerent States (Muhaarabah Fi'lan) To: Ziyad Ziyad

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

Question:

Assalamu alaikum to my brother, Sheikh and Ameer.

1. In a discussion I had with one of the Shabab, we disagreed in regards to the women in the situation of war. Does the Hukm (ruling) of the women that go out to the battle field to encourage the army apply upon them or does the Hukm of Asraa' (captives/prisoners of war) apply to them whilst acknowledging that today there are women fighters like men in terms of carrying weapons, using aircraft, artillery or participate in naval warfare....

2) The following was stated in the publication of Introduction to the Constitution of the Khilafah "Caliphate" State, (Mashroo' Dustoor Dawlat ul-Khilafah "Caliphate") in the fourth point of Article 188: "(In regards to) the actual warring states like Israel for example it is obligatory to take with it the state of war as the basis for all actions and dealings just as if we are in an actual war with it and this is whether a Hudnah (truce) exists between them or not, and all of its subjects are forbidden from entering the lands..." I referred to this article in the book Introduction to the Constitution, and I did not find any details explaining this article and its four points. The question here is: Is it permitted for the Khilafah "Caliphate" State to have a Hudnah (treaty) with the Jewish entity whilst it is usurping our lands?

 

Answer:

Wa alaikum assalam wa Rahmat Allahu wa Barakatahu,

 

Firstly: Yes, the Hukm (ruling) in respect to the women who go out to the battle field whether to encourage the troops or fight alongside them, is the same Hukm. However it is not permitted to kill the women who have come out to the battle scene to encourage the soldiers whereas it is permitted to kill those who are fighting. This is in accordance to the Hadith that is agreed upon on the authority of Naafi' that Abdullah Ibn 'Umar (ra) informed him: "That a woman had been found killed in one of the battles of the Prophet (saw): فَأَنْكَرَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَتْلَ النِّسَاءِ وَالصِّبْيَانِ "So the Messenger of Allah (saw) condemned the killing of women and children." This is in addition to a Saheeh Hadeeth collected by Abu Dawood from 'Umar Bin Al-Muraqqa' Bin Saifi Bin Rabaah who said: My father narrated that his grandfather Rabaah Bin Rabee' said: "We were with the Messenger of Allah (saw) in a military expedition and saw the people gathering around something so he sent for a man and said: «انْظُرْ عَلَامَ اجْتَمَعَ هَؤُلَاءِ؟» "Go and look at what they are gathering around?" He returned and said: Around a woman who has been killed. So he (saw) said:«مَا كَانَتْ هَذِهِ لِتُقَاتِلَ» "This one did not participate in the fighting." The Mafhoom (understanding) from this statement is that had she been fighting then it would have been permissible to kill her.

This is the difference; however in all other Ahkam, there is no difference between women who go to the battlefield to encourage the troops and those who fight alongside the troops.

This all applies to the case when women go out to the battlefield. However if the women remain in their houses without exiting to the battlefields then there is nothing in that regards to them.

And in all circumstances, the application of the Shariah rulings is referred to the Khaleefah and not to the leaders of the battlefields. And the action of the Khaleefah proceeds in accordance to the requirements of the war policy in dealing with the enemies. Since it is from the war-related dealings, which is at the discretion of the Khaleefah's command. He acts according to what he deems fit in regards to the enemy in agreement with the Ahkam Shari'.

As for the Hukm (legal ruling) of the Asraa (captives/prisoners of war), this applies to the male fighters because the word 'Aseer' (captive) when it is mentioned refers to the male fighter. The Hukm of the Asraa is mentioned in Surah Muhammad (saw) in the following Aayah:

 

فَإِذَا لَقِيتُمُ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا فَضَرْبَ الرِّقَابِ حَتَّى إِذَا أَثْخَنْتُمُوهُمْ فَشُدُّوا الْوَثَاقَ فَإِمَّا مَنًّا بَعْدُ وَإِمَّا فِدَاءً حَتَّى تَضَعَ الْحَرْبُ أَوْزَارَهَا ذَلِكَ وَلَوْ يَشَاءُ اللَّهُ لَانْتَصَرَ مِنْهُمْ وَلَكِنْ لِيَبْلُوَ بَعْضَكُمْ بِبَعْضٍ وَالَّذِينَ قُتِلُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ فَلَنْ يُضِلَّ أَعْمَالَهُمْ

 

"So, when you meet (in fight Jihaad In Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, Then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom, until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered] but if it had been Allah's will, He himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets You fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed In the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." [Muhammad: 4]

 

Therefore they are either released (Mannan) or they are ransomed by money or a prisoner exchange with Muslims captives or captives from the Ahl al-Dhimmah. Other than these two options is not permitted.

Secondly: The relationship of the Islamic State with belligerent countries (that are in an actual state of war) (Muharabah Fi'lan).

 

It appears that you still have an older version of the book, Introduction to the Constitution, as you mentioned that this is Article 188 whilst in the official version of 1431 AH (2010) it is Article 189. And secondly in the older version the subject of truce (hudnah) in the case of the actual war was not explained in detail whilst in the new official adopted version it has been detailed. We explain in it that the permanent truce (hudnah) is not permitted as it means the abandoning of Jihad. However, a temporary truce may be held with the disbelieving (kufr) countries by the entity on the land have not yet opened by Muslims. The Daleel (evidence) for this is the Truce of Al-Hudhaibiyah with the Quraish who were upon land that Muslims had yet to conquer.

As for the entity that is established entirely upon usurped Islamic land then it is not permitted to contract a Hudnah (truce) with it albeit permanent or temporary. The reality of the Truce of Al-Hudhaibiyah with the Quraish does not apply upon it because the reality is different. This is because the Quraish were established upon land which had not previously been conquered by the Muslims whereas the Jewish entity is established upon land which it has usurped from the Muslims. So the reality is different and as such the Treaty of Al-Hudhaibiyah is not applied upon it. Rather it is obligatory for the state of actual war to maintain this state of actual war whether or not a Hudnah has been convened between it and the illegitimate rulers in the Muslim lands. This continues until the usurping entity is removed and the land that has been usurped is returned to its rightful people.

 

((وَأَخْرِجُوهُمْ مِنْ حَيْثُ أَخْرَجُوكُمْ))

"And expel them from where they have expelled you."

 

This is because the Hudnah (truce) with the usurping entity means its recognition, its surrender of the land to the usurpers. This is forbidden in accordance to the Shariah and indeed it is a major crime and the one who does this will carry its sin.

The subject is discussed in full detail in Introduction to the Constitution.

 

Your brother,

Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah

 

The link to the answer from the Ameer's Facebook Page:

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands