This Hadith is speculative and speaks about the political conditions that will pass on the Ummah, and one of the meanings of the Hadith is that the Prophet divided the conditions into five conditions (the Prophethood - Rightly-Guided Khilafah "Caliphate" - biting rule - oppressive rule - Rightly-Guided Khilafah "Caliphate"), so when we see that four fifths of the Hadith have fallen on the Ummah, does this not promote this…

and the state had obtained the land in a legal manner and allotted it to a citizen, then its rule is like the rule of reviving uncultivated Kharaji land, it belongs to whoever revives it and secludes it, it's neck and its benefit if he is a Muslim and 'Ushr or half of the 'Ushr is due on him for it." End. And the question is: Is it not the correct…

We have adopted that "the army, internal security, industry, and international relations" are independent departments and not sectors, so why do we use the word ‘sector' and not ‘department'?

Why did we say that the Hadith narrated by Ubadah bin as-Samit in which the six types are mentioned- specifies the Hadith (food for food with like for like), although there is no conflict between the general and specific here, so as to say general through which is meant specific, where this is done to remove any conflict? Why wasn't the food, the "To'm" (الطُعم) in the four types (barley, wheat, dates,…