Tuesday, 29 Rabi' al-thani 1447 | 2025/10/21
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

The Answer to the Question: Regarding Women's Dress To: Talal Fawzi, Blugak Murami, and Mosa Za

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

Similar Questions:

1.    Talal Fawzi: Asalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakatahu. Our Sheikh and Ameer, may Allah grant him dignity, and protect and guard him, and grant him the victory to make this Deen the strongest... Ameen.

 

Our dear sheikh I would like to have the topic clarified for what is allowed for a woman to wear in front of foreign men from her relatives in the private life...for example her non mahram relatives like her paternal and maternal male cousins and brothers-in- law... Is it allowed for her to wear a blouse and trousers in front of them as an example?

 

Jazakum Allah Khair and may Allah bring the supported victory by your hands to this Ummah by establishing the Khilafah "Caliphate" upon the method of the Prophethood.

 

2.    Blugak Murami: Is wearing a wig or having hair extensions not considered as what was mentioned in the hadeeth of the "al-Wasila and Mustawsila"? Jazakum Allah Khair.

 

3.    Mosa Za: Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakatahu,

 

My dear brother:  There is a trend here which is women wear the jilbab that comes down to the knee, and wear trousers underneath, is this permissible?

 

Answers:

Wa Alaikum us Salaam wa Rahmatullah wa Barakatahu,

 

Your questions are related in subject, this is why I will sum them up in one answer:

 

1.    In the private life, the woman lives with her husband and mahram relatives. As for when non-mahram relatives like the maternal and paternal male cousins who come to visit their female relative for kinship ties (silatul rahm) to greet them for Eid and the like... then it is not allowed for the woman to meet them in her house unless her ‘Awra is covered and that she is not in a state of Tabarruj (revealing her charms). Wearing trousers is Tabarruj, so it is not allowed for the woman to wear trousers in front of non mahram relatives who come to visit for kinship ties or Eid greetings.

2.    If a woman goes outside her house into the public life then she must wear the Shar'i dress which fulfils three matters:

 

Her ‘Awra must be covered.

She must not be in a state of Tabarruj.

She needs to wear a Jilbab and Khimar.

 

3.  Jilbab is a wide (loose) dress that covers the home clothes underneath and it is a wrap or an overcoat, it drapes and covers the feet. Allah (swt):

(يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْ لِأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ)

"Oh Prophet tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (jalabeeb) all over their bodies" [Al-Ahzab: 59]

 

So the women should wear on top of their clothes a sheet or a wrap that drapes down. Therefore it is required that the jilbab must be drape down to cover the feet because Allah (swt) says in the verse:

((يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ))

"to draw their cloaks all over their bodies"

 

This is because the preposition (min) here is not partitive but explanatory i.e. if the feet were covered by socks or shoes, this does not negate the fact that the jilbab has to be seen as draping down and it must not be said that since the feet are covered here it is therefore not necessary for the jilbab to drape down. I.e. it must be apparent that the jilbab is draping down so that it is recognised as the public life's dress that women are obliged to wear. And the draping criteria in the verse "yudneena" must be fulfilled. Therefore if the woman wears a trouser in the public life, and wears a Jilbab that reaches the knee on top of the trouser and it does not drape down to cover her feet even though they are covered with socks, then this does not fulfil the shar'i requirements of the jilbab.

 

And it is not allowed for a woman to go outside in the public life except by wearing a jilbab that covers her home clothes underneath, and that they are draping down to her feet. If she does not find one then she cannot go outside unless she borrows one from her neighbour, this is due to the hadith by the authority of Muslim in his Sahih and narrated by Umm Attiya(ra) who said:

أَمَرَنَا رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ، أَنْ نُخْرِجَهُنَّ فِي الْفِطْرِ وَالْأَضْحَى، الْعَوَاتِقَ، وَالْحُيَّضَ، وَذَوَاتِ الْخُدُورِ، فَأَمَّا الْحُيَّضُ فَيَعْتَزِلْنَ الصَّلَاةَ، وَيَشْهَدْنَ الْخَيْرَ،وَدَعْوَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ، قُلْتُ: يَا رَسُولَ اللهِ إِحْدَانَا لَا يَكُونُ لَهَا جِلْبَابٌ، قَالَ: لِتُلْبِسْهَا أُخْتُهَا مِنْ جِلْبَابِهَا

"The Messenger of Allah (saw) ordered us to bring out the young women, the menstruating women, and the veiled women for the two Eid Festival. The menstruating women were to keep away from the prayer, yet witness the goodness and the dawah (address) to the Muslims. I asked," O Messenger of Allah, what about one who does not have a jilbab?" He said: "Let her use the jilbab of her sister."

 

4.            Wearing a wig is considered from Tabarruj. This is why a woman is not allowed to go out to the public life while wearing a wig, unless she wears a khimar to conceal it and it does not leave any signs obvious to the on lookers.

 

It is also not allowed for her to wear it in her house in front of her non mahram relatives because it is Tabarruj as we have mentioned.

 

As for if the wig is what is meant by the wasila and mustawsila (the one who adds the hair extension to someone and the one who has it added to her hair) then it is not so, because the wasl is when a hair extension is added to the hair to increase its length and not to wear a wig on top of the hair. But attaching the hair extension with the hair to make it longer is what is haram to do even if the woman was inside the confines of her own house because of the hadith by the authority of Bukhari and narrated by Abu Huraira(ra) that the

 

«لَعَنَ اللَّه الوَاصِلَةَ وَالمُسْتَوْصِلَةَ...»

The Prophet (saw) said: "Allah has cursed the wasila and mustawsila."

 

As for the wig she can wear it in front of her husband and mahram relatives inside her house only.

 

It is not allowed to wear it in front of non mahram because it is Tabarruj.

 

 

Your brother,

Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah

 

The link to the answer from the Ameer's Facebook Page:

Read more...

News and Comment The Implications of America's Attack on Syria

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:

Recently US Senators have met to hammer out a draft resolution that authorizes an American strike on Syria. The duration of the operation is set to 60 days, which can be further extended by 30 days. The draft resolution, which is to be soon voted by Congress, is a response to Obama's bid to seek approval from US law makers. On September 1st 2013, US President Barack Obama said, "Now, after careful deliberation, I have decided that the United States should take military action against Syrian regime targets...I'm also mindful that I'm the President of the world's oldest constitutional democracy. And that's why I've made a second decision: I will seek authorization for the use of force from the American people's representatives in Congress."

Comment:

So once again Americans find their government on the brink of attacking another Muslim country after having already waged war against Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen and Libya in the past decade or so. However, this is not the first time the US has intervened in Syria. In October 2008, American Special Forces conducted a raid into Syria killing 8 civilians. This time, the US intervention will be more prolonged and the resulting civilian deaths will be much higher.

Many facets of America's second impending strike on Syria can be scrutinized and debated, however, there is only issue that really stands out,  and that is the impact of American hegemony and unilateralism on both the region as well as on the prevalent international system.

Even before the Arab spring revolution, anti-Americanism was rife not only in the Arab countries but also in the wider Muslim world. Since then anti-Americanism has reached an all-time high and there is no evidence to suggest that it will subside anytime soon. On the contrary, American military intervention in Syria will only exacerbate such sentiments. This is dangerous not only for America but also for West's relationship with the Islamic world.  These negative sentiments form the basis for intellectual and political awakening in the Muslim world. It forces Muslims to explore ways on how to become intellectually and politically independent of American hegemony and perpetual Western interference.

Another factor closely related to negative American sentiments is America's duplicity over the application of its ideology in the Islamic world. For instance, why does America ignore the 100,000 or so civilians killed at the hands of the Butcher Assad by conventional means  but raises a huge hue and cry when the same butcher kills 1429 Syrians but this time through chemical weapons. Likewise why does America choose to stand by General Sisi and allow him to use American weapons to kill over a thousand Egyptians and not intervene-Sisi is only gently reprimanded. Additionally there is no mention of American intervention in Palestine and Burma where nothing short of genocide is being perpetrated against Muslims. These are just some of the inconsistencies related to the value of human life placed by America. What about the contradictions regarding the implementation of democracy and freedom in the Islamic countries. The coup in Egypt against the democratically elected leader Morsi and the grotesque episode of Abu Ghraib in Iraq have laid bare American hypocrisy over her two ideological idols: Democracy and Freedom.

The combination of anti-American sentiments and America's ideological duplicity has invigorated Muslim minds to view political Islam rather than liberal democracy as a panacea to their problems. The confidence amongst Muslims in liberal democracy and Western solutions has been further diminished by the sustained economic crisis in the West and the revolt against capitalist policies stretching from Europe to Brazil.  Neither have the false Islamic pretenders such as Ennahda, Muslim brotherhood and others have helped the West in their crusade to promote their civilization in Muslim countries. These groups are despised by the masses and are viewed as endorsing capitalism and American hegemony disguised in Islamic garb. Hence, throughout the Arab and Muslim world, more and more Muslims are embracing political Islam as the only exit solution to their colonization by America and the West.

Therefore it is no longer surprising to find Muslim societies across the Islamic world deeply polarized between secular autocrats struggling to maintain the existing order for America and their colonial masters, and the Muslim masses wanting to liberate themselves through political Islam. The polarization has contributed to increasing instability and chaos, and is responsible for much of the political vacuum that pervades the Muslim world. Subsequently, America's primacy has weakened significantly and this means that America has to resort to greater force to maintain some semblance of control in order to protect her vital interests.

The lack of confidence in Western concepts and solutions has made both the implementation and the longevity of political solutions in Muslim countries difficult for Washington. This is despite the fact that America has considerable military might in the region, compliant military generals, and subservient politicians at her disposal. As soon as America takes a political decision it is not long before it unravels and America compelled to rethink. For instance in Syria the US started by supporting Arab monitors initially, which quickly gave way to Annan's Six Point Plan and this was followed by the Lakhdar Brahimi plan, then the Geneva peace plan was born. Now after military strikes it is anticipated that Geneva peace plan 2 will be mooted. America's failure to fashion successful political solution for countries like Egypt, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Somalia, Afghanistan and Pakistan tells a similar story. In 2006 Pat Buchanan had this to say about America's political failures in the Muslim world. He said, "If Islamic rule is an idea taking hold among the Islamic masses, how does even the best army on earth stop it? Do we not need a new policy?" Several policies later and America is still struggling for a new policy to contain Islam.

On the international front, America's repeated threats to go it alone in Syria have grossly undermined the confidence in the international system. In truth American intransigence to unilaterally invade Iraq in 2003 was the beginning of the end of the international system and a death blow to the UN. As the world increasingly moves towards pre-1920 international framework for dealing with each other-when great powers ruled and international law was just a notion- international law and the UN will no longer be relevant to settle dispute between nations.

Finally, America and its allies in the West have worked tirelessly to craft an international system that for the past 60 odd years has prevented the Muslims masses from establishing their state-the Caliphate. And now by America's own handiwork the Muslim masses are being repeatedly attacked and this has bludgeoned to death any inclining Muslims masses had towards liberal democracy, and ignited their passion for the re-establishment of Caliphate.

The precedence of "humanitarian" intervention established by America, and the subsequent decline in the nation state model together with the fragmentation of the international law all provide a fertile foundation for the Caliphate to not only swiftly unify fifty-five Muslim countries under a single political authority, but also to intervene around the global to protect Muslim populations and spread Islam.

The Caliphate will also reform international relations and dispel the current drivers behind the upkeep of today's international system  such as one rule for the West and another rule for the rest, where might is right and fabricated evidences  are norm to wage preventative wars. Regarding the latter, the belligerence of America and other European states towards the world will be immediately dealt with by the Caliphate, In such cases no evidence will be required as their crimes against humanity are well documented and recorded. In sum, America through its blind arrogance is paving the way for the 21st century to belong to the Caliphate.

قَاتِلُوا الَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَلَا بِالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ وَلَا يُحَرِّمُونَ مَا حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ وَلَا يَدِينُونَ دِينَ الْحَقِّ مِنَ الَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْكِتَابَ حَتَّى يُعْطُوا الْجِزْيَةَ عَنْ يَدٍ وَهُمْ صَاغِرُونَ)) التوبة 29

"Fight those who believe not In Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of truth, (even if They are) of the people of the Book, until They pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." [TMQ 9:29]

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Abed Mustafa

Read more...

Toxic Slavery: Child Labor and Exposure to Intoxication with Mercury in Small Gold Mines in Tanzania!

AlJazeera.net on the 29th of August 2013 quoted Human Rights Watch that thousands of children in Tanzania, some as young as only eight years, are engaged in drilling operations in deep dilapidated mines that stand on the verge of collapse, in shifts of up to 24 hours. These children transport and crush the heavy bags of ore and gold. This information came in a report of the organization entitled:

Read more...

Spiteful Russia Launches Campaign of Arrests against Muslims and Members of Hizb ut Tahrir!

Approximately 150 Muslims were arrested in a large-scale raid in the Oxanov market in the city of Surjut-Siberia, where many of the residents of Central Asia and Northern Caucasus work. The raid began suddenly according to witnesses, when masked men armed with assault rifles broke into the building in broad daylight and surrounded it, and then under their threat of execution they ordered all those present in the building to exit the building and line up on the street.

Read more...

Headlines News 05/09/2013

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

Headlines:

  • Egypt Strikes Tunnels to Gaza
  • Pentagon Knew in 2012 that It would Take 75,000 GROUND TROOPS to Secure Syria's Chemical Weapons Facilities
  • The US Is Doing an Awful Lot of Spying on Pakistan
  • Indonesian Muslims Hold Anti-Miss World Protest

Details:

Egypt Strikes Tunnels to Gaza

Egyptian forces struck tunnels that connect Gaza and Egypt, according to local residents in Rafah. Reuters video showed explosions in the area followed by smoke clouds in Rafah on the border between Gaza and Egypt. The strike explosion took place at around sunset. About 80 percent of tunnels used to smuggle goods and arms into the Gaza Strip from Egypt are no longer functioning due to a crackdown by the Egyptian military after it ousted President Mohamed Morsi, a United Nations official said in July. Cairo moved to destroy the tunnels after militants in the Egyptian Sinai desert killed 16 of its soldiers a year ago. Egypt said some of the gunmen had slipped into Sinai from nearby Gaza, an accusation denied by Hamas, who controls the strip. Gaza relies on the network of tunnels for vital goods including fuel, cement and food. Hamas, which taxes much of the traffic through the underground passages, has been hit hard by the losses. Ordinary Palestinians, many of them dependent on U.N. aid handouts, have seen prices for staple goods skyrocket. Israel still maintains strict control of all imports into Gaza to prevent arms reaching Hamas, which refuses to recognize the Jewish state and has often clashed with it. Under international accords, merchandise cannot be imported via Egypt. [Source: Voice of America]

 

Pentagon Knew in 2012 that It would Take 75,000 GROUND TROOPS to Secure Syria's Chemical Weapons Facilities

Securing Syria's chemical weapons stockpiles and the facilities that produced them would likely require the U.S. to send more than 75,000 ground troops into the Middle Eastern country, MailOnline learned Wednesday. That estimate comes from a secret memorandum the U.S. Department of Defense prepared for President Obama in early 2012. U.S. Central Command arrived at the figure of 75,000 ground troops as part of a written series of military options for dealing with Bashar al-Assad more than 18 months ago, long before the U.S. confirmed internally that the Syrian dictator was using the weapons against rebel factions within his borders. ‘The report exists, and it was prepared at the request of the National Security Advisor's staff,' a Department of Defense official with knowledge of the inquiry told MailOnline Wednesday on condition of anonymity. [Source: UK Daily Mail]

 

The US Is Doing an Awful Lot of Spying on Pakistan

The $52.6 billion U.S. intelligence arsenal is aimed mainly at unambiguous adversaries, including al-Qaeda, North Korea and Iran. But top-secret budget documents reveal an equally intense focus on one purported ally: Pakistan. No other nation draws as much scrutiny across so many categories of national security concern. A 178-page summary of the U.S. intelligence community's "black budget" shows that the United States has ramped up its surveillance of Pakistan's nuclear arms, cites previously undisclosed concerns about biological and chemical sites there, and details efforts to assess the loyalties of counter­terrorism sources recruited by the CIA. Pakistan appears at the top of charts listing critical U.S. intelligence gaps. It is named as a target of newly formed analytic cells. And fears about the security of its nuclear program are so pervasive that a budget section on containing the spread of illicit weapons divides the world into two categories: Pakistan and everybody else. The disclosures - based on documents provided to the Washington Post by former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden - expose broad new levels of U.S. distrust in an already unsteady security partnership with Pakistan, a politically unstable country that faces rising Islamist militancy. They also reveal a more expansive effort to gather intelligence on Pakistan than U.S. officials have disclosed. The United States has delivered nearly $26 billion in aid to Pakistan over the past 12 years, aimed at stabilizing the country and ensuring its cooperation in counterterrorism efforts. But with Osama bin Laden dead and al-Qaeda degraded, U.S. spy agencies appear to be shifting their attention to dangers that have emerged beyond the patch of Pakistani territory patrolled by CIA drones. "If the Americans are expanding their surveillance capabilities, it can only mean one thing," said Husain Haqqani, who until 2011 served as Pakistan's ambassador to the United States. "The mistrust now exceeds the trust." [Source: Washington Post]

 

Indonesian Muslims Hold Anti-Miss World Protest

Indonesian Muslim hard-liners staged a protest on Tuesday in the country's capital to try to stop the holding of the Miss World pageant this weekend on the resort island of Bali. More than 200 members of several Muslim hard-line groups organised by the Islamic Society Forum staged a rally and march to the MNC Tower, the building that houses the local organiser of the contest. They held up banners with "Reject Miss World that exploits women" and "Go to hell Miss World" on them, and shouted "Allah Akbar," outside the building, which was guarded by 300 police. "This is an insult and humiliation of women," Muhammad Al Khathath, an Islamic Society Forum leader, told the crowd. "Muslims should reject the Miss World contest," he said. The demonstration was peaceful and broke up after protest leaders met with the pageant organisers. Last week, the Indonesian Ulema Council, the country's most influential clerics group, urged the government to cancel the event, saying the exposure of skin by women in such a competition violates Islamic teachings, even after organisers agreed to cut the bikini competition and instead outfit contestants in more conservative sarongs. The chairwoman of the Miss World Organisation, Julia Morley, earlier confirmed that none of the contestants would wear a bikini. [Source: South China Morning Post]

Read more...

News and Comment Democracy Breathes to Death in Hell

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:

More than a thousand of MPs, members of Provincial Councils, tribal leaders and influential people gathered yesterday (03/09/13) in Kabul. They asked Afghan government to consider the security situation of the country and postpone the Provincial and Presidential Elections of April 2014. They were consisted of elders, leaders and youths, who claimed that their movement is not backed by any party and it is purely from among the people.

Comment:

Democracy had no value in the Afghan society, from the very first day it stepped onto the Afghan soil. What is ironic is this movement is arranged by those who claimed the slogans of democratic freedoms and elections during 12 years of invasion. Meanwhile, during implementation of the so called democracy in the country, Afghans had only seen bloodshed and disrespect towards their Aqeedah. This is why, MPs and PC members, or those who oath to implement and support Western and Capitalist democracy and non-Islamic constitution, now turned against it.

Particular facts behind this scenario that explains why they are trying to throw away democratic values are as under:

The people who denied communism and fought against it for a long time in the past, could not ignore the political advantages and vast amount of money poured into the country by the West. So at first they started to implement the Western imported system that brought nothing except poverty, unemployment, adultery, corruption and "Fitnah" to the Muslims of Afghanistan. Thus, after a long time this spectrum of people awakened and turned against democracy.

During past two presidential and parliamentary elections, the Elections Commission and Western Advisors proved that elections in the presence of colonialism means nothing. By considering the huge corruption and fraud in the elections, only those become president, Member of Parliament or Member of Provincial Councils, who are most committed to the Western and Democratic values. Therefore, people don't have belief in the process, its value and its significance in their lives...

As a result of political and intellectual struggle by Hizb ut Tahrir particularly in the provinces with low level of war, has paved the way for the people to understand the Shari'ah Law and differentiate it from democracy, elections, Western concepts and that the current government is a puppet of the US   and is implementing western agenda in the country. This struggle, nevertheless, will continue with its energy and significance towards the Islamic awakening in this part of the Islamic land.

A hard and strong resistance against US and NATO occupation in major parts of the country, turned these areas into "no election zones". The vote boxes are filled in the provincial capitals in the favor of those candidates who pays more than the others, who consequently win the so-called elections.

In the meantime, the lack of an industrial and economic progress and as well as the lack of a real, ideological and people backed party, only paved the way for those who accept western values and concepts and stand before any foreign embassy for political support, thus the successful candidates become real puppets.

In another scene, the Kafir West before elections has raised many issues to preserve its occupation and colonialism in the country.

The West tried to bring forward those distinguished individuals and parties before elections under one umbrella which is called National Ijma'a (National Consensus), so specific candidates will have the chance to announce their commitment to the western ideology. This concept is portrayed and carried by Zalmay Khalilzad, an American politician who is natively an Afghan. On the other hand, this concept is further developed by western technocrats like Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai, Ali Ahmad Jalali and Anwarul Haq Ahadi.

As it is mentioned in the news above, another western agenda is to create an alternative through Karzai's team. And that will be an interim government in case if the Elections are faced with a boycott by the people that will be expressed either via Loya Jirga or other means. And this can be achieved through insecurity. So, this is another possible mean that will finally lead to an emergency situation that will result to an interim government.

Another issue that is pursued in both cases, is the peace process with armed anti-government forces. Attempts will be made on a permanent base in order to make peace with them based on American conditions and also the way for any changes in the constitution will be open. This is an issue that seems to be followed in both cases.

Therefore, such electoral coalitions which are made of former Mujahidin and some criminals, has zero influence among ordinary people and they are perceived as stock companies trying to play with the fate of Muslims in Afghanistan. They only try to gain political and financial advantages, therefore no one believes them. In the meantime, Western technocrats also have nearly zero level of influence among ordinary people, as they have shown their full capacity in the ministries. Furthermore, they only try to retain the interests of the West and don't care about people's standard of living.

Despite the above mentioned points, Afghan government claims that it sense no security threats in 3435 polling centers from total of seven thousand. Remaining centers are completely under control of the armed anti-government elements.

In conclusion, the US led invasion in the past 12 years, made Afghanistan a hell to Afghans. This is achieved by their manmade laws, plans and concepts which are implemented through brutal bombardments and direct occupation. But the time has come that Democracy gives its last breaths in itself mad hell, and no Muslim will desire to live under Democracy in the future.

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Saifullah Mustanir

Kabul- Wilayah Afghanistan

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands